I wonder if when using a filter, you might get different results ? OK, well those times make more sense, now that you've confirmed your settings. And if I want to get 2.3% more performance for 50% more power I can. Even for us that torture the CPUs for encoding, underlocking them ever so slightly produces great performance. So even though the chips can eek out more performance by pushing them to their max, I don't think for real world use it's necessary. I think you'll need to disable the GPU portion though so it runs all CPU. I'm curious, since you have both CPUs, you should run a test and let us know which CPU wins (regardless of power used). The 7950x seems to go to it's limit and hold there. The 13900K seems very bursty in the way it was designed and it throttles back in only a few seconds. The amount of heat/watts consumed by the new Intel 13900K is staggering (yea, that is a furnace): I think both AMD and Intel are chasing every last bit of performance they can to one up each other. I can run the same tests but I think the results will be similar. Not using any filters for those tests, just CQ16. Those encoding time's for "Puss In Boot's", that's encoding the movie in less time that it takes to watch it !!!Īre you using any filters, or is it only CQ 16 ?Īnd as for power usage, that fortunately isn't that much of an issue for me, as I only encode when the Solar Panels are generating enough, and I don't do any "overnight" encoding, been there, done that, was very disappointing, most of the time It's also a shame that some of us spend our hard-earned money on "top of the line" hardware (eg:- 7950X's, and 13900K's), only to find they use SO much power, and produce SO much heat, that "we" go to great lengths to "hobble" them, to make them more 's almost pointless, really.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |